From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:58:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602232058.59170.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006101c6389e$9bbbc440$1f570b50@mshome.net>
On Thursday 23 February 2006 17:28, Frédéric Gava wrote:
> is anybody can semantically explain why this 2 types are differents ?
>
> # type t=A of int*int and t'= B of (int*int);;
> type t = A of int * int
> and t' = B of (int * int)
Only historical reasons, AFAIK. I do not believe this is necessary or that
there is a logical reason for doing so.
> Morever I think that int*int=(int*int) in ML
Yes. I think it is logical to expect that.
> > And since the runtime representations are different, the types have to be
> > different.
>
> Wrong, you can the same representation but different types (e.g. int, char
> or many other examples)
I also believe that statement was wrong but I don't think you have provided
counter-examples because the run-time representations are the same for the
different types that you cite (rather than the converse).
Perhaps this is a better counterexample: the following functions "f" and "g"
use different run-time representations but still have the same type:
# let f (a, b) = a+b
let g (a, b as x) = a+b;;
val f : int * int -> int = <fun>
val g : int * int -> int = <fun>
camlT2__f_58:
.L100:
lea -1(%eax, %ebx), %eax
ret
.text
.align 16
.globl camlT2__g_61
.type camlT2__g_61,@function
camlT2__g_61:
.L101:
movl 4(%eax), %ebx
movl (%eax), %eax
lea -1(%eax, %ebx), %eax
ret
.text
.align 16
.globl camlT2__entry
.type camlT2__entry,@function
I suspect a similar transformation could be done for variant type
constructors.
Also, note that this behaviour does not appear with polymorphic variants,
where int * int <=> (int * int):
# type t = A of int * int | B of (int * int);;
type t = A of int * int | B of (int * int)
# type t = [ `A of int * int | `B of (int * int) ];;
type t = [ `A of int * int | `B of int * int ]
I assume the arguments of a polymorphic variant are always boxed...
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-23 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 17:28 Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 18:33 ` [Caml-list] " Eric Cooper
2006-02-23 19:03 ` Martin Jambon
2006-02-23 19:07 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 20:15 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-23 21:30 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 21:57 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-23 22:30 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 22:50 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-23 23:07 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-24 8:38 ` Alessandro Baretta
2006-02-24 12:59 ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-23 18:33 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-02-23 18:56 ` David Brown
2006-02-23 19:24 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 19:37 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 19:45 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-24 0:01 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-02-24 0:18 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2006-02-24 2:17 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-02-24 13:07 ` Alain Frisch
2006-02-25 17:42 ` Vincent Balat
2006-02-25 18:30 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-02-25 19:09 ` Richard Jones
2006-03-01 12:48 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-02-25 23:17 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2006-03-01 13:01 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-02-27 11:14 ` camlp4 renovation [was: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?] Hendrik Tews
2006-02-24 13:39 ` [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ? Nicolas Cannasse
2006-02-24 14:49 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-24 8:27 ` also for tagged records? [Was: Re: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?] Sebastian Egner
2006-02-24 14:01 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-02-23 20:58 ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2006-02-23 21:36 ` [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ? Frédéric Gava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602232058.59170.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox