Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] From a recursive circuit to a functional/recursive OCaml-code...
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:52:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060206115208.GA470@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139118167.8453.254.camel@rosella>

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:42:47PM +1100, skaller wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 05:16 +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> 
> > But I'm not clear about how to write this function "f",
> > because it needs mutual recursion...
> 
> No it doesn't, not even with feedback, because your
> system is CLOCKED.
[...]

I need for this task one clock.
I can do a clock (in binary values) with true and false
or 1 and 0 or so with a variable.
I can do this with loops or functions that inverts their
last value (true -> false   and false -> true) with simple
toggling.
I then could use this value and do things depending on the value.

But this one clock I also can do with two mutual recursive
functions. Each one represents the work that must be done
in one state (or more precise: when switching from one state to the
other).
So with two functions that call each other recursively I can
do a toggling value (state machine with two states) by
func_x1 calling func_x2 and then func_x2 calling func_x1.

Another reason why I started intuitively with a recursive
definition of my code here.



Ciao,
   Oliver


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-06 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-04 21:19 Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05  2:29 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2006-02-05  4:16   ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05  5:42     ` skaller
2006-02-05 14:17       ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05 16:05         ` skaller
2006-02-05 18:07           ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-06 11:52       ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2006-02-06 13:10         ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05  5:55     ` Bill Wood
2006-02-05 11:26       ` [Caml-list] From a recursive circuit to a functional/recursiveOCaml-code Frédéric Gava
     [not found]     ` <1139134445.28935.14.camel@localhost>
     [not found]       ` <20060205175014.GA1969@first.in-berlin.de>
     [not found]         ` <1139178136.463.37.camel@localhost>
2006-02-05 23:23           ` [Caml-list] From a recursive circuit to a functional/recursive OCaml-code Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05 23:46             ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-06  3:39             ` skaller
2006-02-05 11:45 ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05 18:19 ` Oliver Bandel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060206115208.GA470@first.in-berlin.de \
    --to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox