Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] From a recursive circuit to a functional/recursive OCaml-code...
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:19:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060205181929.GA2159@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060204211943.GA590@first.in-berlin.de>

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 10:19:43PM +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 

dito ;-)


> 
> how to implement a simple non-trivial machine (Heinz von Foerster)
> in a purely functional manner?
> 
> With functional/recursive OCaml code?
> 
> I had written a mail with attachement (which contains a
> jpeg with the structure of the circuit), but it seems it
> was blocked or filtered away by the OCaml mailinglist software?!
> 
> So I try to give it as some formulas:
> 
> 
> let u = func_B x e
> let e = func_C u
> let y = func_A x
> 

I started with the wrong things in mind, sorry!

I have picked the original work (the picture I put on the web
was from somwhere else, not the original) from HvF and found
the following description:

  
   A is an operator/function that works like a trivial machine
   B is an operator/function that works like a trivial machine
   c is the internal state!


So it should be possible to have only c as a state variable and all
other stuff will be derived from the input x and the internal
state c via the functions/operators A and B.


Sorry for the wrong start, it was too long ago when I looked
into the original work! :(

So, now the direction is different.


But nevertheless thanks for all your efforts on helping with
implementing it in OCaml. :)

Regards,
   Oliver


      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-05 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-04 21:19 Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05  2:29 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2006-02-05  4:16   ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05  5:42     ` skaller
2006-02-05 14:17       ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05 16:05         ` skaller
2006-02-05 18:07           ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-06 11:52       ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-06 13:10         ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05  5:55     ` Bill Wood
2006-02-05 11:26       ` [Caml-list] From a recursive circuit to a functional/recursiveOCaml-code Frédéric Gava
     [not found]     ` <1139134445.28935.14.camel@localhost>
     [not found]       ` <20060205175014.GA1969@first.in-berlin.de>
     [not found]         ` <1139178136.463.37.camel@localhost>
2006-02-05 23:23           ` [Caml-list] From a recursive circuit to a functional/recursive OCaml-code Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05 23:46             ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-06  3:39             ` skaller
2006-02-05 11:45 ` Oliver Bandel
2006-02-05 18:19 ` Oliver Bandel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060205181929.GA2159@first.in-berlin.de \
    --to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox