From: Pietro Abate <Pietro.Abate@anu.edu.au>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] composing functions...
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:38:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051201013847.GA16098@pulp.anu.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad8cfe7e0511301655w2466f021yee19b32cc07ac95d@mail.gmail.com>
Let's see if I'm able to apply these 4 days of reading about monads...
module ListMonadMake(T:sig type t end) =
struct
type mt = T.t list
let return x = [x]
let join mm = List.flatten mm
let map f m = List.map f m
let bind m f = join (map f m)
let mzero = []
let mplus = List.append
end
module LM = ListMonadMake(struct type t = int end);;
open LM ;;
let apply1 (a,b,c) = [a;b;int_of_char c] ;;
let apply2 a = [a] ;;
let compose f1 f2 m = bind (bind (return m) f2) f1;;
let f v = compose apply1 apply2 v ;;
f (1,2,'a');;
- : int list = [1; 2; 97]
does this help ? I'm still learning, but I see a lot of potential
here... How do people encode monads in ocaml ? Can you use objects
to build monads similarly to Haskell ?
:)
pp
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:55:38PM +1300, Jonathan Roewen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a bit stuck, and am wondering if there's anyway to compose
> a bunch of functions together easily without having to pre-maturely
> apply any of them.
>
> My current idea is trying to use objects, like:
>
> class virtual ['a] composable = object (self)
> method compose a b = self#apply a @ b
> method virtual apply : 'a -> int list
> end;;
>
> class c1 = object
> inherit ['a] composable
> method apply (a,b,c) -> [a;b;int_of_char c]
> end;;
>
> class c2 = object
> inherit ['a] composable
> method apply a -> [a]
> end;;
>
> let o1 = new c1 and o2 = new c2;;
>
> I can do something like let f a1 a2 = o1#compose a1 (o2#compose a2
> []);; and get a list back...
>
> But what I'm wondering is if it's possible to make a generic compose
> function that takes say a list of either classes or object instances,
> and return a new function that I can apply the bunch of tuples to.
>
> Theory: let f = compose [o1;o2];; f a1 a2;; maybe it's not worth the
> hassle (if it's even possible).
>
> Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
--
++ Blog: http://blog.rsise.anu.edu.au/?q=pietro
++
++ "All great truths begin as blasphemies." -George Bernard Shaw
++ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-01 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-01 0:55 Jonathan Roewen
2005-12-01 1:34 ` skaller
2005-12-01 2:00 ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-12-01 8:46 ` Daniel Bünzli
2005-12-01 1:38 ` Pietro Abate [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051201013847.GA16098@pulp.anu.edu.au \
--to=pietro.abate@anu.edu.au \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox