From: Martin Chabr <martin_chabr@yahoo.de>
To: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Ant: Re: FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:52:07 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051005205208.65943.qmail@web26807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051005121028.GA757@first.in-berlin.de>
>From my limited experience I see it this way:
Mathematical computations, algorithms, interfacing
(complicated data conversions), text translations,
parsing, anything which can be well represented by
dataflow diagrams and where there is no changing state
==>
use FP
User interfaces, business systems, anything with
objects which have changing states and which react to
events and interact with each other ==> use OOP
Martin
--- Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:39:28PM -0400,
> Christopher A. Watford wrote:
> [...]
> > This list is best for asking OCaml questions and
> is awful for asking
> > for what language is best for what, nobody agrees.
> [...]
>
>
> I was not asking, what language is better for
> soimething, or best at all.
> I asked for what programming style/paradigm is best
> used to solve
> certain problems.
>
> As OCaml provides more than one programming
> paradigm, for me
> it's the best language I ever had programmed in
> (some
> other features are also fine).
>
> So the question goes in a different direction:
> How to solve problems best, if you have the
> possibility
> do do it in different ways.
>
> Well, every programmer can choose it's own way, but
> if certain areas
> are well known to do them in a certain way best, it
> makes sense
> to go that direction.
>
> For example, I'm not really a fan of OO-programming,
> but when
> programming GUI-software I think it would be the
> best choice,
> and FP-programming lacks flexibility here (if not
> using
> a DSL to create GUI-code, which then is separately
> compiled).
>
> Ciao,
> Oliver
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
>
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 21:32 Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-09-26 0:23 ` [Caml-list] " Bill Wood
2005-09-26 7:57 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
2005-09-26 8:17 ` William Lovas
2005-09-26 21:07 ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-09-26 22:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-30 22:57 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01 0:07 ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2005-10-01 5:46 ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01 8:27 ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 18:02 ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 21:50 ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-01 12:34 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01 13:58 ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01 21:05 ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 0:41 ` skaller
2005-10-03 1:13 ` Seth J. Fogarty
2005-10-03 13:09 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 14:57 ` skaller
2005-10-03 20:03 ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 20:25 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 21:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 18:06 ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-04 18:32 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 2:53 ` skaller
2005-10-04 16:15 ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 16:47 ` FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel
2005-10-04 22:38 ` Michael Wohlwend
2005-10-05 0:31 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 22:39 ` Christopher A. Watford
2005-10-04 23:14 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 12:10 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 13:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 15:28 ` skaller
2005-10-05 20:52 ` Martin Chabr [this message]
2005-10-05 23:21 ` Ant: " Markus Mottl
2005-10-06 16:54 ` brogoff
2005-10-05 0:45 ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 18:09 ` Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-10-05 8:42 ` skaller
2005-10-05 11:14 ` Andrej Bauer
2005-10-01 21:36 ` Ant: Re: Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 11:51 ` getting used to FP-programming (Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051005205208.65943.qmail@web26807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
--to=martin_chabr@yahoo.de \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox