Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:44:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508301644.37964.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830172518.G58228-100000@xs2.xs4all.nl>

On Tuesday 30 August 2005 16:33, mmzeeman wrote:
> The Clean programming language seems to have a nice functional GUI api
> (http://www.cs.ru.nl/~clean/index.html).

Thanks for the link. I'll check it out.

> Personnaly I like the Qt api. I think it should be possible to
> create/generate c++ to ocaml-objects wrappers so you could create Qt GUIs
> with ocaml.

This is exactly the kind of thing that I'd like to avoid. Firstly, Qt is a 
very expensive commercial product so we wouldn't use it. Secondly, Qt goes to 
great lengths to circumvent flaws in the C++ language. It would be a great 
shame to "port" these to OCaml. Finally, I found that TrollTech's own Qt 
demos segfault reliably, so I'd question Qt's stability.

I'd much rather see only low-level bindings with all of the widget code 
written in OCaml.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-30 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-28 15:38 Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
     [not found] ` <aefe758210f7fa0b9846b0ea4278cf3a@rouaix.org>
2005-08-28 23:21   ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-29 22:33 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30  4:39   ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 11:39     ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-30 11:48     ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 12:22       ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:45         ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 15:47           ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 16:08             ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-01  4:25               ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:20                 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:26                   ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 14:09                 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 16:21           ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-08-30 17:47           ` [Caml-list] " David Thomas
2005-08-30 18:06             ` Tyler Eaves
2005-08-30 19:01             ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:55               ` Chris Campbell
     [not found]               ` <c22844d10508301553b54841b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-30 22:56                 ` Fwd: " Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 23:04                   ` Doug Kirk
2005-08-31  0:08                   ` Fwd: " Jon Harrop
2005-08-31  0:31                     ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-08-31  8:48               ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-31  9:06                 ` Proposal a GUI from Ocamlsdl Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-31 14:39                   ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 19:27                     ` Nathaniel Gray
2005-08-31 14:27                 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Jon Harrop
2005-09-01  4:49                 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:15                   ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-09-01 13:28                     ` David MENTRE
2005-09-01 13:50                       ` skaller
2005-09-01 14:43                     ` Chris Campbell
2005-09-02  7:40                     ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-09-02 12:39                       ` skaller
2005-09-03 10:34                         ` Damien Bobillot
2005-09-03 12:30                           ` skaller
2005-09-04 14:08                           ` Richard Jones
2005-09-03 11:10                         ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-03 11:30                           ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-09-03 17:23                           ` Doug Kirk
2005-09-04 14:01                         ` Richard Jones
2005-09-01 19:23                 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Nathaniel Gray
2005-09-01  4:31             ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
2005-09-01  4:17       ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:25         ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30  7:16   ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-30  9:53     ` GUI for OCaml Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-30 10:28       ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:04         ` Bünzli Daniel
2005-08-30 17:13         ` David Thomas
2005-08-30 11:18       ` Mark Shinwell
2005-08-30 14:22       ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-30 23:12         ` Pietro Abate
2005-08-30 14:14     ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Richard Jones
2005-08-30 15:33       ` mmzeeman
2005-08-30 15:44         ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2005-08-30 22:34         ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-01  4:58           ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 16:01       ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 16:25         ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:49           ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 16:03       ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:31     ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-31  8:19       ` About Lablgtk2 (was: e: GUI for OCaml) David MENTRE
2005-09-03 11:41         ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 17:35   ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Olivier Andrieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508301644.37964.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox