From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
To: David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:14:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050830141430.GA16012@furbychan.cocan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d13dcfc050830001671d0974f@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:16:20AM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> The client of my application is also written in Lablgtk2 and, despite
> helpful answers by Jacques Garrigue and Olivier Andrieux as well as
> SooHyoung Oh's tutorials, I find programming with Labgtk2 not very
> easy (to say the least). I find Lablgtk2 is largely under-documented.
> Of course, this is a large task that cannot be achieved by two
> individuals.
Lablgtk2 is a pain, but I think the pain comes from Gtk itself, not
any shortcomings in lablgtk2 or ocaml.
> I'd also loved too. Having a cross-platform GUI (with native look and
> behaviour on Windows and MacOS X), programmed using a functional
> style, well documented (with reference manual and tutorial) and with
> necessary tools (GUI design application) would be very very helpful.
>
> However this is a huge task. [...]
It is a huge task. I'm not even sure what a "functional" API for a
GUI toolkit would look like. Ideas? Example code snippets?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-30 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-28 15:38 Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
[not found] ` <aefe758210f7fa0b9846b0ea4278cf3a@rouaix.org>
2005-08-28 23:21 ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-29 22:33 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 4:39 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 11:39 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-30 11:48 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 12:22 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:45 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 15:47 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 16:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:25 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:20 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:26 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 14:09 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 16:21 ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-08-30 17:47 ` [Caml-list] " David Thomas
2005-08-30 18:06 ` Tyler Eaves
2005-08-30 19:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:55 ` Chris Campbell
[not found] ` <c22844d10508301553b54841b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-30 22:56 ` Fwd: " Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 23:04 ` Doug Kirk
2005-08-31 0:08 ` Fwd: " Jon Harrop
2005-08-31 0:31 ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-08-31 8:48 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-31 9:06 ` Proposal a GUI from Ocamlsdl Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-31 14:39 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 19:27 ` Nathaniel Gray
2005-08-31 14:27 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:49 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:15 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-09-01 13:28 ` David MENTRE
2005-09-01 13:50 ` skaller
2005-09-01 14:43 ` Chris Campbell
2005-09-02 7:40 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-09-02 12:39 ` skaller
2005-09-03 10:34 ` Damien Bobillot
2005-09-03 12:30 ` skaller
2005-09-04 14:08 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-03 11:10 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-03 11:30 ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-09-03 17:23 ` Doug Kirk
2005-09-04 14:01 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-01 19:23 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Nathaniel Gray
2005-09-01 4:31 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 4:17 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:25 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 7:16 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-30 9:53 ` GUI for OCaml Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-30 10:28 ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:04 ` Bünzli Daniel
2005-08-30 17:13 ` David Thomas
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Mark Shinwell
2005-08-30 14:22 ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-30 23:12 ` Pietro Abate
2005-08-30 14:14 ` Richard Jones [this message]
2005-08-30 15:33 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) mmzeeman
2005-08-30 15:44 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:34 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-01 4:58 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 16:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 16:25 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:49 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 16:03 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:31 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-31 8:19 ` About Lablgtk2 (was: e: GUI for OCaml) David MENTRE
2005-09-03 11:41 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 17:35 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Olivier Andrieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050830141430.GA16012@furbychan.cocan.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=david.mentre@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox