From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3672FBDDB for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:52:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp10.wanadoo.fr (smtp10.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.21]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7RJqhrd018044 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:52:44 +0200 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1001.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D1A6C18000A9 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:52:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-6-156.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.196.156]) by mwinf1001.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AE37418000A1; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:52:43 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050827195243713.AE37418000A1@mwinf1001.wanadoo.fr Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50) id 1E96eO-0005Tt-Et; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:47:36 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:47:31 +0200 To: skaller Cc: Sven Luther , Chris Campbell , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] LablGL on Ubuntu? Message-ID: <20050827194731.GA21032@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050826224607.GA21237@localhost.localdomain> <1125101097.25384.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050827012113.GC29153@localhost.localdomain> <1125143346.7794.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1125143346.7794.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Sven Luther X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4310C48B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 lablgl:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 ocaml:01 packagers:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 debian:02 debian:02 external:02 external:02 rebuild:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, skaller wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 03:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > There are some differences I have discovered, for example > > > Debian and Ubuntu use distinct documentation 'help' systems. > > > > Cosmetical and external stuff though, It is still the debian ocaml packagers > > who do all the job. > > Cosmetic and external stuff though, it is still Inria developers > that do the main job .. :) Well, there is certainly more in the debian packages than just a documentation hook change and a rebuild, but sure, we all know who makes the main work. > > > And: Debian does not support AMD64. Ubuntu does. > > > > Sure, Debian does support AMD64, it is not in the official archive yet > > It's on Alioth, my ISP doesn't mirror it, and the same quality > control isn't applied to it, since it is still under development. there are mirrors around, ftp2.de.debian.org carries it for example, not sure if ftp2.fr.debian.org does. As for under development, sorry, but that is pure FUD, the only reason it is not in the archive, is because of mirror space and bandwidth consideration in the archive. The security team supports it, and it was released at the same time as debian/sarge, so as far as quality control is going, it is there. Friendly, Sven Luther