From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAE6BDDA for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:50:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7QMok09028935 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:50:46 +0200 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 335951C00CE5 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:50:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-6-156.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.196.156]) by mwinf0108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1A19C1C00CE1; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:50:46 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050826225046107.1A19C1C00CE1@mwinf0108.wanadoo.fr Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50) id 1E8mxg-0005Wk-EW; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:46:12 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:46:07 +0200 To: Chris Campbell Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] LablGL on Ubuntu? Message-ID: <20050826224607.GA21237@localhost.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Sven Luther X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 430F9CC6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 lablgl:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 lablgl:01 libgl:01 distro:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 25,:98 wrote:01 debian:02 rebuild:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:51:21PM +0100, Chris Campbell wrote: > Hi, > > Is it safe to install LablGL on Breezy? It wants to remove nvidia-glx > and libgl1-xorg. I'm running breezy to test it and know the risks > about using an unstable distro (i ran sid for a year). Don't want to > remove anything critical. > > Will OCaml 3.08.4 feature in Breezy (thinking of the 64 bit fixes specifically)? Notice that ubuntu doesn't really have ocaml packages, just rebuild debian ones, so why not use the real thing ? :) Friendly, Sven Luther