From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08680BCA2 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:30:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7HBUY0F010113 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:30:34 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA21508 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:30:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mxintern.schlund.de (mxintern.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.201]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7HBUXrL010110 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:30:33 +0200 Received: from [172.17.36.11] (helo=schluck.use.schlund.de) by mxintern.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E5M7t-0004RT-95 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:30:33 +0200 From: Michael Wohlwend To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List Subject: ocaml on palms... Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:30:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 X-Face: S)[vu%Bha1d&ej9GfwAq~7C}A,y[B.uS}+D6'hb~xPwsxymw$fnCOaMe<=?utf-8?q?*bnUajSBR=5Fm=3FR=0A=09?=@V3;iX8[A}z`.%pEQ1r7iZhN8#ktTCBQ}&mkx>=RH&l|l6\]NZI@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508171330.32986.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43031FDA.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43031FD9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 runtime:01 cheers:01 ...:98 sony:98 michael:08 michael:08 question:11 400:87 but:12 some:12 such:13 200:84 run:15 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 I know this question was asked some time ago, but those little devices are getting better every day:-) The tungsten T3/T5 have 400MHz and 64MB, T5 has 256 MB ram; my sony has 200MHz and 32MB Ram (o.k., not much). Could ocaml (not caml-light) run on such a T3 or T5? Or just the runtime and cross-compiling? cheers Michael