From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: FYI: (IMHO nice field for FP) => "Tools session in 2nd International Workshop on Web Services and Formal Methods"
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:53:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050625185320.GA437@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
Hello,
seems to be a nice field for functional programming:
I found the following "Call For Tools" in comp.compilers:
>
> WS-FM 2005 TOOLS SESSION
>
> Tools session in 2nd International Workshop on Web Services and
> Formal Methods
>
> Versailles, 2-3 September 2005, France
>
> http://www.cs.unibo.it/WS-FM05
>
> Web services technology is a widespread accepted instantiation of
> Service Oriented Computing which facilitates integration of newly
> built and legacy applications both within and across organizational
> boundaries avoiding difficulties due to different platform,
> heterogeneous programming languages, security firewall, etc... The
> idea behind the WS approach is allowing independently developed
> applications to be exposed as services and interconnected exploiting
> the already set up Web infrastructure with relative standards (HTTP,
> XML, SOAP and WSDL). The technologies related to developing basic
> services and interconnecting them on a point-to point basis can be
> considered well established but B2B processing requires managing
> more complex interactions involving a large number of participants
> and none of the above standards are able to meet this need. For this
> reason the so-called Web services Composition Languages like XLANG,
> WSFL, BPML, WS-BPEL and WS-CDL are taking place. These languages are
> claimed to be based on formal models (pi-calculus variants, Petri
> Nets) to allow rigorous mathematical reasoning. However, despite all
> this hype, no interesting relations with formal methods have been so
> far emphasized and no conceptual instruments for analysis and
> reasoning or software verification techniques and tools have been so
> far presented by the respective companies. Any mathematical rigor
> becomes pointless without the ability to show these kind of results.
> In this sense contracts conformance verification between different
> services and static analysis of behavioral properties becomes one of
> the most promising research directions.
>
> The aim of the tools session is presenting working prototypes
> designed exploiting the experience derived from concurrency theory
> (and formal methods in general) in order to strengthen the
> collaboration with industry and resulting in a strong impact on the
> standardization phase of composition languages and of web services
> technologies in general.
>
> LIST OF TOPICS
>
> The topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
>
> * Orchestration engines for Web services
> * Frameworks for recovery mechanisms in Web services composition
> * Static analyzers and verificators of behavioral properties
> * Contracts conformance checkers
> * Frameworks for securing Web services
>
> SUBMISSION MODALITIES
>
> To submit please send the information below to:
> ws-fmtools@cs.unibo.it
>
> Submissions must include:
>
> * Name of the tool
> * Name(s) of the author(s)
> * Name(s) of the person(s) presenting the demo at the workshop
> * A short abstract presenting the tool and the underpinning
> theory. It should describe the way in which the theory benefits the
> implementation.
> * A link to a web site presenting the project.
>
> Submissions deadline: 3 August 2005
>
> DEMO MODALITIES
>
> The demos presentation will be held as a special session of WS-FM
> 2005. Each presentation will take about 25 minutes plus 10 for the
> discussion.
>
> CONTACTS
>
> * Mario Bravetti (bravetti@cs.unibo.it)
> * Roberto Lucchi (lucchi@cs.unibo.it)
> * Manuel Mazzara (mazzara@cs.unibo.it)
> * Gianluigi Zavattaro (zavattar@cs.unibo.it)
Seems the right thing for some of the Gurus of this list. :)
Ciao,
Oliver
reply other threads:[~2005-06-25 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050625185320.GA437@first.in-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox