From: Eijiro Sumii <eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: sumii@saul.cis.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ambitious proposal: polymorphic arithmetics
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:50:19 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050406.145019.90114474.eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050406163915.GC15547@force.stwing.upenn.edu>
Thanks to everybody for the excitements!:-)
From: "William Lovas" <wlovas@stwing.upenn.edu>
> Many experts (and perhaps some novices *shrug*) think that polymorphic
> equality is a bad idea...
I'm almost tempted to agree.:-) As other responses have also
suggested, the issue seems to be "where to draw the line." If so, I
can perhaps restate my question as: why is the line drawn between =
and + now? Is it the best?
Eijiro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-06 15:15 Eijiro Sumii
2005-04-06 15:51 ` [Caml-list] " Sébastien Hinderer
2005-04-06 15:56 ` Richard Jones
2005-04-06 16:43 ` Dmitry Lomov
2005-04-06 18:59 ` Richard Jones
2005-04-06 19:19 ` Jacques Carette
2005-04-07 0:01 ` Ethan Aubin
2005-04-06 16:39 ` [Caml-list] " William Lovas
2005-04-06 16:59 ` Andreas Rossberg
2005-04-06 18:50 ` Eijiro Sumii [this message]
2005-04-06 19:33 ` Eijiro Sumii
2005-04-07 0:13 ` William Lovas
2005-04-07 1:58 ` Jacques Garrigue
2005-04-06 17:00 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2005-04-06 19:20 ` Eijiro Sumii
2005-04-07 14:00 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2005-04-06 17:23 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2005-04-06 18:01 ` padiolea
2005-04-06 19:14 ` Eijiro Sumii
2005-04-06 20:31 ` Eijiro Sumii
2005-04-06 21:53 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2005-04-06 22:38 ` Eijiro Sumii
2005-04-06 19:23 ` Richard Jones
2005-04-09 2:58 ` Jon Harrop
2005-04-09 3:16 ` Eijiro Sumii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050406.145019.90114474.eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp \
--to=eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=sumii@saul.cis.upenn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox