From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: exception safety / RAII ?
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:32:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050308123210.GA4997@furbychan.cocan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1110281592.680.102.camel@localhost>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:33:12PM +0200, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
> IMHO currently the closest to the "best of both worlds" is a good
> garbage collector (with non-deterministic finalization) and explicit
> management for those resources that need them (file handles are a good
> example; in addition to the reasons already mentioned in this thread,
> also because they may refer to sockets and to avoid running into file
> descriptor limits).
I think it'd be nice to have both finalisation and destructors when a
local variable goes out of scope. You might need to mark variables
specially to indicate that those (and only those) should be reference
counted. I understand that the implementation would be non-trivial.
Perhaps:
val open_in : string -> in_channel refcounted
There was a great paper I read about a year ago all about how
finalisation and destruction are completely separate concepts.
Unfortunately I can't find it now ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-08 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-05 18:16 Michael Benfield
2005-03-05 18:44 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2005-03-07 0:03 ` Jon Harrop
2005-03-07 1:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-07 2:48 ` [Caml-list] " Brian Hurt
2005-03-07 13:30 ` Jon Harrop
2005-03-07 14:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-07 17:10 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-03-08 13:07 ` Damien Doligez
2005-03-08 21:56 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-03-09 13:34 ` Damien Doligez
2005-03-09 14:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-09 16:19 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-03-09 22:45 ` [Caml-list] Re: exception safety / RAII Oliver Bandel
2005-03-09 23:42 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-03-10 14:33 ` exception safety / RAII ? Stefan Monnier
2005-03-10 16:52 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-03-11 14:46 ` Michael Walter
2005-03-12 22:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-07 15:21 ` [Caml-list] " Michael Walter
[not found] ` <200503071729.20117.jon@jdh30.plus.com>
2005-03-07 18:47 ` Michael Walter
2005-03-08 1:10 ` Jon Harrop
2005-03-08 22:19 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-03-08 22:53 ` Daniel Yokomizo
2005-03-09 1:21 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-03-09 13:21 ` Damien Doligez
2005-03-08 11:33 ` [Caml-list] " Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-03-08 12:32 ` Richard Jones [this message]
2005-03-08 14:17 ` Michael Walter
2005-03-08 18:28 ` Jon Harrop
2005-03-08 21:34 ` Damien Doligez
2005-03-09 15:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-09 22:30 ` [Caml-list] " Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2005-03-10 14:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-08 21:32 ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2005-03-07 3:31 ` [Caml-list] " Michael Walter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050308123210.GA4997@furbychan.cocan.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox