From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF71BC88
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 23:57:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from first.in-berlin.de (dialin-145-254-062-176.arcor-ip.net [145.254.62.176])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j17MvgjZ020102
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:57:43 +0100
Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 04652A9A74; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 23:57:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:57:42 +0100
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [Benchmark] NBody
Message-ID: <20050207225742.GA473@first.in-berlin.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502071126400.1980-100000@localhost> <4207C9D7.6000804@yahoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4207C9D7.6000804@yahoo.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4207F266.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 caml-list:01 wrote:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 wrote:01 ocamlopt:01 -inline:01 -unsafe:01 -inline:01 gcc:01 inlining:01 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:04:39PM +0100, sejourne_kevin wrote:
> Martin Jambon a écrit :
> >On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>For fun I have implemented an nbody simulation following
> >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=nbody&lang=all&sort=cpu
> >>(code is attached).  I've compiled it with
> >>
> >> ocamlopt -o nbody.com -inline 3 -unsafe -ccopt -O2 nbody.ml
> >
> >
> >-inline 100 gives better results for me (around -25%)
> >This should be enough to beat Java :-p if you get the same improvement on
> >your side.
> Same for me, but "-ccopt -O2" don't change anything.


If using gcc, you have to use -O3 to enable inlining.

If using only -O2, inlining is not enabled automatically by the gcc.


Ciao,
   Oliver