From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C598BB91 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:50:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (use.the.admin.shell.to.set.your.reverse.dns.for.this.ip [80.68.91.176] (may be forged)) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j02AoSfk028356 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:50:28 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cl3JJ-0007Yl-00; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:50:09 +0000 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:50:09 +0000 To: Jacques Garrigue Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wishes for an easy install of Ocaml Message-ID: <20050102105009.GA29025@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <20041227151807.GA3501@club-internet.fr> <20041227165411.GA3342@pegasos> <20041231162037.GA11346@furbychan.cocan.org> <20050102.102149.112764189.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20050102.102149.112764189.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41D7D1F4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 ocaml-mode:01 tuareg:01 tuareg:01 ocaml:01 logical:01 jacques:01 face:97 seems:03 garrigue:03 configured:03 indentation:04 indentation:04 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:21:49AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > The core ocaml-mode has been written by so many people, that nobody > will take the blame (I hope so, or you could face a vendetta.) > The problem with it is that the code is such spagetthi that it gets > difficult to improve it (at least the indentation part.) >=20 > Having never tried Tuareg (mostly out of inertia, since I'm satisfied > with the core mode), could you be more precise about what is better in > Tuareg. Excluding indentation style of course, as this is a matter of > taste. (But note that in order to replace the core mode, you have to be > able to indent in exactly the same way.) I don't know about the exact details, but I notice the difference when I have to use a machine which doesn't have tuareg-mode installed. So much so that I just install tuareg before going any further. Integration with font-lock-mode seems better. I'm quite sure that tuareg-mode can be configured to indent the same way as the core mode. Since tuareg-mode is actually developed at INRIA, it would seem fairly logical to integrate it into OCaml. Rich. --=20