From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A382BB81 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:48:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBRGm5h3031172 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:48:05 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0409.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 302C21C003AB; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:48:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-201-1-4-91.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.252.182.91]) by mwinf0409.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0C6211C0039F; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:48:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Ciy8J-0000sj-6s; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:54:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:54:11 +0100 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, Debian Ocaml Maint ML Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wishes for an easy install of Ocaml Message-ID: <20041227165411.GA3342@pegasos> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, Debian Ocaml Maint ML References: <41CBDA52.9040608@leledy.org> <20041224110432.GB25189@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> <20041227151807.GA3501@club-internet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041227151807.GA3501@club-internet.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Sven Luther X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41D03CC5.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 ralf:01 treinen:01 wrote:01 zacchiroli:01 wrote:01 emacs:01 tuareg:01 emacs:01 load-path:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: ** On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 12:04:33PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 09:58:58AM +0100, Philippe Lelédy wrote: > > > > but it is not enough, adding some obscure lines to .emacs is necessary > > > b/c the old Caml mode is effective by default but Tuareg is not. Time > > > spent to explain that is very counter-productive to Unix new-bies. > > > Debian tuareg-mode does half the job by adding tuareg-mode directory to > > > emacs load-path, but manual addition of (load "append-tuareg") is still > > > necessary. > > > > I'm not an expert Emacs user, but this issue is definitely related to > > the tuareg-mode debian package. You can get in touch with that package > > maintainer and/or file a whishlist bug report against it in order to > > automate the emacs configuration. > > > > Ralf (or someone else of the debian ocaml maintainer with Emacs skill), > > could you please comment on this and other emacs related needs which > > could possibly by automated on tuareg-mode installation? > > We had this dicussion already earlier on this list. At that time we > agreed *not* to activate automaticallt tuareg-mode for *.ml* files > since the ocaml package provids another emacs mode for editing > .ml files. Hence, the decision at that time was that the user shoulde > decide for himself which emacs mode he wans to use. What about installing tuareg by default in the ocaml-core or whatever meta-package, and have it ask a debconf question at priority medium about which of the two emacs bindings should be used ? Friendly, Sven Luther