From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Functional pattern for converting database results to structures
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:09:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041222130933.GA16609@annexia.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3146 bytes --]
[This isn't really a question about OCaml, or ML, but functional
programming in general.]
I often come across the same problem. I have to read a table of data
(often the result of a SQL query, or a CSV file), and create a
hierarchical structure from it.
For example, my current problem is a table of data which looks like
this:
Campaign Adgroup Keyword Advert Campaign_status Adgroup_status
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer04 Domain KW1 AD1 Finished Finished
Summer04 Domain KW2 AD1 Finished Finished
Summer04 Domain KW3 AD1 Finished Finished
Summer04 Domain KW4 AD1 Finished Finished
Summer04 Domain KW5 AD2 Finished Finished
Summer04 Domain KW6 AD2 Finished Finished
Summer04 Offer1 KW7 AD3 Finished Finished
Summer04 Offer2 KW8 AD3 Finished Finished
Summer04 Offer3 KW9 AD3 Finished Finished
Summer04 Offer4 KW10 AD3 Finished Finished
Winter04 Domain KW1 AD1 Active Active
Winter04 Domain KW2 AD1 Active Active
Winter04 Domain KW3 AD1 Active Active
Winter04 Domain KW4 AD1 Active Active
Winter04 Domain KW5 AD2 Active Active
Winter04 Domain KW6 AD2 Active Active
Winter04 Offer5 KW7 AD3 Active Active
Winter04 Offer5 KW8 AD3 Active Active
Winter04 Offer5 KW9 AD3 Active Active
Winter04 Offer6 KW10 AD4 Active Active
and I'd like to come out with a structure like this:
type campaign = { campaign_name : string; campaign_status : string;
adgroups : adgroup list }
and adgroup = { adgroup_name : string; adgroup_status : string;
keywords : keyword list;
adverts : advert list }
and keyword = { keyword : string }
and advert = { advert : string }
I've previously been using a "group_by" function kindly written by
Isaac Trotts (see thread here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/1556 ).
val group_by : ('a * 'b) list -> ('a * 'b list) list
group_by [1, "foo"; 2, "bar"; 2, "baz"; 2, "biz"; 3, "boo"; 4, "fizz"];;
- : (int * string list) list =
[(1, ["foo"]); (2, ["bar"; "baz"; "biz"]); (3, ["boo"]); (4, ["fizz"])]
But it's still complicated to use, particularly when we have several
levels of nesting, and, as in this case, the levels aren't even
cleanly nested (adgroups have both keywords and adverts).
Help! What's a good pattern for solving this problem?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/
>>> http://www.team-notepad.com/ - collaboration tools for teams <<<
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment
Advanced wiki and collab tool - http://sandbox.merjis.com/
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041222130933.GA16609@annexia.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox