Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: replacing Mathematica was: Polymorphic pretty printing
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:44:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410282244.44931.jon@jdh30.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041028.151108.108534348.debian00@tiscali.be>

On Thursday 28 October 2004 14:11, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> IMHO, the main "annoyance" with that goal is notational: there will be
> many uses of "+" for example and each of these will need its own
> notation.  While I am not bothered by the two "+." and "+", this can
> become heavy when one manipulates lots of different structures
> (vectors, matrices, polynomials, groups,...).  GCaml will be great for
> this.

Yes, OCaml is not well suited to implementing conventional mathematical 
notation because of operator overloading.

However, in GCaml, do the different definitions (e.g. "+" : int -> int -> int 
| float -> float -> float) have to be specified at the same time (i.e. in the 
"+" function)? If so, then GCaml is also ill suited...

Cheers,
Jon.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-28 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-27 19:15 HENRIKSON, JEFFREY
2004-10-28  5:30 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2004-10-28 11:25 ` Andrej Bauer
2004-10-28 13:11   ` [Caml-list] " Christophe TROESTLER
2004-10-28 20:45     ` Andrej Bauer
2004-10-29 13:01       ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-10-28 21:44     ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2004-10-29 13:11       ` Christophe TROESTLER

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200410282244.44931.jon@jdh30.plus.com \
    --to=jon@jdh30.plus.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox