From: Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Phantom types
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:49:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408231049.59342.jon@jdh30.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040731163143.GB15775@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at>
On Saturday 31 July 2004 17:31, Markus Mottl wrote:
> module type PHANTOM_INT = sig
> type 'p t
> ...
Right, I've had a bit more of a chance to play with phantom types now, and I'm
quite confused. :-)
As far as I can tell, there were a few errors in Markus' original (I may well
be wrong, of course), so here is my altered version:
module PhantomInt : sig
type 'p t
val add : 'p t -> 'p t -> 'p t
val add_even_even : [ `Even ] t -> [ `Even ] t -> [ `Even ] t
val add_even_odd : [ `Even ] t -> [ `Odd ] t -> [ `Odd ] t
val add_odd_even : [ `Odd ] t -> [ `Even ] t -> [ `Odd ] t
val add_odd_odd : [ `Odd ] t -> [ `Odd ] t -> [ `Even ] t
val neg : 'a t -> 'a t
val make_even : int -> [ `Even ] t
val make_odd : int -> [ `Odd ] t
end = struct
type 'p t = int
let add = (+)
let add_even_even = add
let add_even_odd = add
let add_odd_even = add
let add_odd_odd = add
let neg n = -n
let make_even n = if n mod 2 = 0 then n else failwith "not even"
let make_odd n = if n mod 2 <> 0 then n else failwith "not odd"
end;;
So I've changed the types to be [ `Even ] instead of [> `Even ] and the "make"
functions to be "int -> ...". This appear to work as desired:
# let i = PhantomInt.make_even 2;;
val i : [ `Even ] PhantomInt.t = <abstr>
# let j = PhantomInt.make_odd 3;;
val j : [ `Odd ] PhantomInt.t = <abstr>
# PhantomInt.add_even_odd i j;;
- : [ `Odd ] PhantomInt.t = <abstr>
# PhantomInt.add_even_even i j;;
This expression has type [ `Odd ] PhantomInt.t but is here used with type
[ `Even ] PhantomInt.t
These two variant types have no intersection
Now, there are some subtle peculiarities of these which I don't understand.
Firstly, the type checking of the phantom types only seems to work if the
type is made abstract in the module signature. I can't think why this should
make a difference though. For example, changing "type 'p t" to "type 'p t =
int" in "PhantomInt : sig" then allows:
# PhantomInt.add_even_even i j;;
- : [ `Even ] PhantomInt.t = 5
which is clearly undesirable.
Secondly, specifying the types as Markus did (e.g. [> `Even]), which I think
should have been correct, leads to some kind of monomorphic type:
# PhantomInt.add_even_odd i j;;
- : _[> `Odd ] PhantomInt.t = <abstr>
Note the "_" preceding the "[> `Odd]". I'm not sure what the implications of
this are.
Can someone explain these to me, please?
Cheers,
Jon.
PS: I'm using 3.08.0, in case that makes a difference.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-23 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-31 8:56 [Caml-list] const equivalent for mutable types? Christopher A. Gorski
2004-07-31 9:24 ` Jean-Marie Gaillourdert
2004-07-31 10:24 ` Jean-Marie Gaillourdert
2004-07-31 10:50 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-31 14:31 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-31 15:51 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-31 17:05 ` skaller
2004-07-31 10:34 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-31 13:44 ` Jon Harrop
2004-07-31 16:31 ` [Caml-list] Phantom types Markus Mottl
2004-08-23 9:49 ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2004-08-23 12:25 ` [Caml-list] Why does ocaml use custom buffering? Daan Leijen
2004-08-23 15:16 ` [Caml-list] Phantom types Jon Harrop
2004-08-27 9:03 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-08-25 21:03 ` brogoff
2004-07-31 16:35 ` [Caml-list] const equivalent for mutable types? skaller
2004-07-31 17:23 ` [Caml-list] Functional arrays Jon Harrop
2004-07-31 18:45 ` skaller
2004-08-02 5:07 ` brogoff
2004-08-02 7:45 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-08-05 16:42 ` Daniel Ortmann
2004-08-05 17:02 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-08-05 17:16 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-07-31 17:45 ` [Caml-list] const equivalent for mutable types? Chris Gorski
2004-07-31 14:11 ` Brian Hurt
2010-05-17 14:59 Phantom types Thomas Braibant
2010-05-17 16:37 ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408231049.59342.jon@jdh30.plus.com \
--to=jon@jdh30.plus.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox