From: Jacques GARRIGUE <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: rich@annexia.org
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Optional and mandatory labels with the same name in the same function ?
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:49:07 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040715.234907.125102370.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040715142305.GA14257@redhat.com>
From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
> It's a bit more subtle than that. OCaml 3.07 always picks the last
> argument, and ignores the others. Thus:
>
> # let f x x = x;;
> val f : 'a -> 'b -> 'b = <fun>
> # let f x x x x = x;;
> val f : 'a -> 'b -> 'c -> 'd -> 'd = <fun>
>
> But a future version might pick the first argument, or one in the
> middle, or one at random. I can't find any guarantee in the manual
> that the behaviour won't change, so this might cause a bug.
Well, it's not directly related to the question I was answering, but I
can reassure you. This behaviour is well defined, because
let f x x = x
is no more than a shorthand for
let f = fun x -> fun x -> x
which is quite natural for anybody versed in lambda-calculus.
I cannot cite you whre the manual specifies that, but this not a case
of undefined behaviour.
More generally, ocaml may leave some runtime behaviour unspecified,
but the static behaviour (type-checking) is expected to be fully
specified.
Jacques Garrigue
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-15 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 11:54 Berke Durak
2004-07-15 14:11 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-07-15 14:23 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-15 14:49 ` Jacques GARRIGUE [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040715.234907.125102370.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=rich@annexia.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox