* [Caml-list] What's the current status of int32 and int64 boxing?
@ 2004-07-14 3:17 John Prevost
2004-07-14 9:43 ` Xavier Leroy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Prevost @ 2004-07-14 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
I was just wondering what exactly to expect for performance with int32
and int64 types in records and arrays right now. Browsing through the
archives, I got the feeling that these types currently appear unboxed
in record types, but boxed in array types. Is that still correct?
John.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-14 9:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-14 3:17 [Caml-list] What's the current status of int32 and int64 boxing? John Prevost
2004-07-14 9:43 ` Xavier Leroy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox