From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA31487; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:08 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA31896 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from quincy.inria.fr (quincy.inria.fr [128.93.8.52]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5O836SH028680; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:06 +0200 Received: by quincy.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 23861) id 7BC7B11C448; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:06 +0200 From: Michel Mauny To: Hendrik Tews Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] factor 5 speed increase for natively compiled camlp4 parsers Message-ID: <20040624080306.GA712@quincy.inria.fr> Reply-To: Michel.Mauny@inria.fr References: <16580.63367.560204.157305@ithif51.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20040623150725.GA2294@quincy.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40DA8ABA.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 natively:01 camlp:01 hendrik:01 tews:01 2004:99 hendrik:01 tews:01 2004:99 extensible:01 natively:01 bug:01 faq:01 faq:01 beginner's:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Yes, you're right. Then, I don't know. It might be possible, if pa_r.ml and pa_rp.ml have the right structure (to be processed in the same way, producing a pa_r_fast.ml). -- Michel Hendrik Tews wrote/écrivait (Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:22:59AM +0200): > Michel Mauny writes: > > Hendrik Tews wrote/écrivait (Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:17:27AM +0200): > > > Why is it not used for the revised syntax? > > I suspect the revised syntax is meant to stay extensible, and this > extensibility would be lost if the parser was compiled `as much as' > the one obtained in pa_o_fast. > > No, this cannot be the reason. You can never extend the natively > compiled version because you cannot load any modules. > > Thanks for your answers, > > Hendrik > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners