From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA27479; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:50:53 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA27363 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:50:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3QEoqYM029106 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:50:52 +0200 Received: from bourg.inria.fr (bourg.inria.fr [128.93.11.100]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA27452 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:50:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from basile by bourg.inria.fr with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BI7R7-0000Qs-Pl for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:50:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:50:21 +0200 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] [ANN] ocamljitrun-1.1 Message-ID: <20040426145021.GA1470@bourg.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Basile Starynkevitch local X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; basile:01 basile:01 callbacks:01 callbacks:01 ocamlc:01 callback:01 byterun:01 callback:01 runtime:01 slower:01 ocamlc:01 compiler:01 cristal:01 cristal:01 ocaml:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Dear All, You can find the version 1.1 of my Ocamljit just-in-time bytecode to machine language translator & interpreter on http://cristal.inria.fr/~starynke/ocamljitrun.tar.gz See also my homepage on http://cristal.inria.fr/~starynke/ for remarks The following bugs fixes have been made: callbacks run correctly the toplevel run correctly (both runs correctly on small tests - I did not test yet significant stuff for C callbacks and toplevel) all simple tests (those in ocaml/tests) and the ocamlc compiler itself already passed on the initial release, of course they pass again. You need the latest CVS of the Ocaml system - since I had to correct some callback code (in byterun/callback.c) and to add a routine caml_prepare_bytecode in the runtime (also called by the toplevel) If some people test the latest CVS of Ocaml, I would be delighted if they took some time to test this ocamljitrun and report bugs to me. Ocamljitrun may sometimes run slower than the bytecode interpreter: When running a very short time (eg running ocamlc on a small source file), because of the startup time needed for bytecode -> machinecode translation Callbacks (from C to ocaml) are more expensive, since every callback requires translation of a short bytecode sequence. Thanks, and hoping for some feedback. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH -- basile dot starynkevitch at inria dot fr Project cristal.inria.fr - phone +33 1 3963 5197 - mobile 6 8501 2359 http://cristal.inria.fr/~starynke --- all opinions are only mine ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners