Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
To: "Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] suggestion: do not link to www.ocaml.org
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:36:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040414183651.GC21331@excelhustler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OOEALCJCKEBJBIJHCNJDCEPPHAAB.vanevery@indiegamedesign.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:16:02AM -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
> > > To you.  And I submit, you are a techie who thinks the word
> > > 'hacker' has
> > > positive connotations.  Suits don't see it that way.  Not that I'm a
> >
> > Sure, but -- who gives a damn?
> 
> Clearly not you.  Since you're not interested in entertaining the
> perspective of target demographics other than your own, I don't see a
> reason to belabor explaining anything to you.  You won't listen.

Nope, that's not what I'm saying.  What I am saying is that you are
poking at OCaml.org, complaining that it doesn't target suits.  Well, it
doesn't *try* to target suits; it's targeting techies, so I don't see
the problem.  I think it's fine to also target suits, but if a single
site tries to reach everyone, it will wind up doing a poor job for any
one particular interest.

> > The site is clearly aimed at programmers who will understand.
> 
> If one wants to grow a language base, why should it be so narrowly
> aimed?

I don't think there's a real problem with aiming at the people that will
actually use it.  Granted, hackers only make up part of the OCaml
community; they may in fact be a minority compared to the scientists and
mathematicians using OCaml.  But I would suspect those audiences also
can find something of value on ocaml.org.

The point about the news freshness is indeed quite important; nobody
wants to use a language that is dying.

> > > Sure.  A 2% market share can't be wrong.  ;-)  Beats OCaml by a mile
> > > though.
> >
> > You have no idea what the Python "market share" is,
> 
> One point of data:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
> There are others.  You can Google for them yourself.  If you actually
> want to know, it's knowable.  The ballpark is certainly correct: try
> going to Monster.com and searching for Python jobs.  ;-)  Now try OCaml.
> ;-) ;-)

Well, we're verging on being off-topic here, but yes, I know Python is
more popular than OCaml.  Neither the tiobe.com nor search engines
produces a very reliable number, though; a valid survey would likely be
required to do that.

-- John

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-14 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-13 22:27 Henri DF
2004-04-13 22:43 ` [Caml-list] " Alan Post
2004-04-13 23:01   ` Henri DF
2004-04-13 23:29     ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 22:58 ` [Caml-list] " Zed A. Shaw
2004-04-13 23:25   ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14  1:12     ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14  4:32       ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 15:14         ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 16:28           ` Matt Gushee
2004-04-14 18:16           ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 18:36             ` John Goerzen [this message]
2004-04-14  5:34     ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14  6:26       ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14  6:32         ` Kenneth Knowles
     [not found]           ` <20040414070841.GA6062@roke.freak>
2004-04-14  7:32             ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 11:12       ` skaller
2004-04-14 16:01         ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15  0:32           ` skaller
2004-04-15  5:37             ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-13 23:38   ` Karl Zilles
2004-04-13 23:00 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-14 15:17   ` Richard Jones
2004-04-14 19:05   ` Xavier Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040414183651.GC21331@excelhustler.com \
    --to=jgoerzen@complete.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=vanevery@indiegamedesign.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox