From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA16981; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:31:20 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA15740 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:31:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (fichte.ai.univie.ac.at [131.130.174.156]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i38MWCjq027481 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:32:12 +0200 Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (markus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i38MV4Hn024829; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:31:04 +0200 Received: (from markus@localhost) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i38MV4Um024828; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:31:04 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:31:04 +0200 From: Markus Mottl To: John Goerzen Cc: Kenneth Knowles , Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Message-ID: <20040408223104.GB19556@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> Mail-Followup-To: John Goerzen , Kenneth Knowles , Ocaml Mailing List References: <20020104004356.GA1672@mev> <20040408133727.GC29195@excelhustler.com> <20040408152301.GA18372@tallman.kefka.frap.net> <20040408153836.GE30763@excelhustler.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408153836.GE30763@excelhustler.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 dynamically:01 2004:99 knowles:99 univie:01 binaries:01 binaries:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 0700,:01 executables:01 mottl:02 mottl:02 native:02 native:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 186 On Thu, 08 Apr 2004, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:23:01AM -0700, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > If you haven't already, take a look at the OCamlMakefile here: > > http://www.ai.univie.ac.at/~markus/home/ocaml_sources.html > > I had already looked at, and discared, OCamlMakefile because of several > problems -- mainly the inability to manage more complex projects that > may generate several executables that share some modules, and the > ability to determine, at build time, whether to build native binaries > and libraries. What concerns "more complex projects": the latest major change to OCamlMakefile was support for subprojects (which may also share some modules!). So I hope that this issue is not relevant anymore. And regarding the optional building of native binaries/libraries: this can be added. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners