From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA13412; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:20:45 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA12801 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:20:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from calmail-cl.berkeley.edu (mailfarm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.61.106]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i38LKgYM015316 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:20:42 +0200 Received: from [64.162.212.212] (HELO tallman.kefka.frap.net) by calmail-cl.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 14681048; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:20:41 -0700 Received: by tallman.kefka.frap.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:20:04 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:20:04 -0700 From: Kenneth Knowles To: Evan Martin Cc: Richard Jones , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) Message-ID: <20040408212004.GA23759@tallman.kefka.frap.net> References: <4072E7C4.5090008@socialtools.net> <20040407230810.619.qmail@web41205.mail.yahoo.com> <20040408134847.GE29195@excelhustler.com> <20040408140650.GA31763@redhat.com> <20040408204725.GA13612@danga.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408204725.GA13612@danga.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; knowles:99 ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 2004:99 evan:01 2004:99 ocamlodbc:01 generic:01 one-to-one:01 api:01 0700,:01 unix:02 loads:03 module:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 185 On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 01:47:25PM -0700, Evan Martin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:06:50PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > * OCamlDBI supports only two database servers. OcamlODBC supports many > > > more through the system's ODBC support, but loads the entire result > > > set into memory before handing it over to the user, which makes it > > > unusable for many serious projects. > > > > Sure. Needs money and/or time. OCamlDBI tries to be a generic layer, > > but the specific database drivers don't appear by magic. I'm more > > than willing to integrate any straight away, and actually they're not > > too hard to write. > > Er, speaking of which, I have a driver for SQLite that I had forgotton > to send to you. > > (Not that three is much better than two, but it's at least a start.) Well, as long as we are on the subject, I have wrapped FreeTDS (ct-lib) and in the process created an ocamldbi module for it (in additional to a more one-to-one mapping with the C API). As soon as I get it nicely packaged... Kenn ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners