From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA18745; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:39:56 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA18420 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:39:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i38FdsYM002494 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:39:54 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BBbdB-0006Z3-DV for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:39:53 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: University of Cambridge To: Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:39:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20020104004356.GA1672@mev> <20040408151427.GA740@redhat.com> <20040408152654.GB18473@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20040408152654.GB18473@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404081639.59998.jdh30@cam.ac.uk> X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 dynamically:01 2004:99 run-time:01 inefficient:01 ocaml:01 mottl:02 wrote:03 account:96 markus:04 efficiency:05 functions:05 mean:05 cheers:06 resulting:10 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 155 On Thursday 08 April 2004 4:26 pm, Markus Mottl wrote: > That's also my opinion: it's usually an indication of a bad choice > concerning datastructure if you need such list functions. If you mean a bad choice from the point of view of efficiency then yes, it is, but I know that the resulting inefficient code will only account for a fraction of a percent of the total run-time and, therefore, I don't care. I just want to have to write as little code as possible to get the job done. Cheers, Jon. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners