From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA06888; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:39:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA06746 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:39:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos.bsdclusters.com [69.55.225.36]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i36HcwYM002591 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:38:58 +0200 Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos [69.55.225.36]) by demos.bsdclusters.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i36HctWW001594; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kmacy@fsmware.com) Received: from localhost (kmacy@localhost) by demos.bsdclusters.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i36Hctsu001591; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: demos.bsdclusters.com: kmacy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Kip Macy X-X-Sender: kmacy@demos.bsdclusters.com To: Benjamin Geer cc: skaller@users.sourceforge.net, Vasili Galchin , Dustin Sallings , Kenneth Knowles , caml-list Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) In-Reply-To: <4072E7C4.5090008@socialtools.net> Message-ID: <20040406103751.O83128@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <20040406042014.85553.qmail@web41210.mail.yahoo.com> <1081236270.19232.41.camel@pelican> <4072E7C4.5090008@socialtools.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; kip:99 ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 committee's:99 model:01 model:01 bug:01 faq:01 faq:01 beginner's:01 beginners:01 bin:01 caml-bugs:01 ocaml:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 79 Widespread adoptance of C++ pre-dates the ISO committee's bloating of the language. -Kip On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Benjamin Geer wrote: > skaller wrote: > > Caml has a different development model, and one can > > imagine a reluctance to move it closer to the C++ > > model for fear the result might be similar .. > > Do you mean wide use of the language in industry? :) > > Ben > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners