Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] serious type confusion
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:16:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040327181638.GA8360@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16485.47700.498923.656556@soggy.deldotd.com>

On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 09:31:00AM -0800, briand@aracnet.com wrote:
> 
> OK, this is what I get for coding too long in scheme :-)
> 
> observe the following:
> 
> # let a=ref [];;
> val a : '_a list ref = {contents = []}
> # a := {x=0.;y=0.;z=0.} :: [];;
> - : unit = ()
> # !a;;
> - : point list = [{x = 0.; y = 0.; z = 0.}]
> # a := {x=0.;y=0.;z=0.} :: !a;;
> - : unit = ()
> # !a
>   ;;
> - : point list = [{x = 0.; y = 0.; z = 0.}; {x = 0.; y = 0.; z = 0.}]
> # 
> 
> Exactly as expected !  types aren't so bad after all..  until here :
> 
>               current_polyline := {x=wx; y=wy; z=wz} :: !current_polyline;
> 
> This expression has type point but is here used with type point list
> 
> Huh?  The first example worked.  Oh I see, it's operator precedence,
> it's assigning the point before doing the concatenation.  Oh but wait,
> it worked in the previous example.  I'll try and fix it anyway...
> 
>               current_polyline := ({x=wx; y=wy; z=wz} :: !current_polyline);
> 
> This expression has type point but is here used with type point list
> 
> Huh ???  Isn't that impossible ?  I've triple checked and
> current_polyline is always consistently used as a list, and more
> importantly a point list...
> 
> Any hints ?

Hints, yes. Hard to say for sure without seeing more of your code, but
two things that occur to me offhand are:

* Is current_polyline defined within the same scope where the error
  occurs, or is it received as an argument? If it is the latter, and
  somewhere before the error location there is an expression that *uses*
  !current_polyline as a point, that would explain your error.  If your
  function is too complex to easily identify the problem by sight, an
  easy way to check for this would be to put a type constraint on the
  parameter:

    let myfun (current_polyline:point list ref) =
      ....

  That way you'll get an error on entry into the function if
  current_polyline is wrongly defined in the calling scope. If, on the
  other hand, there was an expression that tried to use the value as a
  point, it will now fail.

* Pay attention to *exactly* which expression is causing the error--
  i.e., not just the line number, but also the position in the line.
  Is it possible that !current_polyline is actually a 'point list list'
  rather than a 'point list'? If so, then of course the new element you
  add to it must be a 'point list'.

Hope this helps.

-- 
Matt Gushee                 When a nation follows the Way,
Englewood, Colorado, USA    Horses bear manure through
mgushee@havenrock.com           its fields;
http://www.havenrock.com/   When a nation ignores the Way,
                            Horses bear soldiers through
                                its streets.
                                
                            --Lao Tzu (Peter Merel, trans.)

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-27 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-27 17:31 briand
2004-03-27 17:55 ` briand
2004-03-27 18:16 ` Matt Gushee [this message]
2004-03-27 18:34   ` briand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040327181638.GA8360@swordfish \
    --to=mgushee@havenrock.com \
    --cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox