From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA17832; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:46:11 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA17758 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:46:10 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from mwinf0804.wanadoo.fr (smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2M6kgKW019742 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:46:42 +0100 Received: from lambda (AStrasbourg-206-1-37-235.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.64.235]) by mwinf0804.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 247EF180005C; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:46:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by lambda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B5JCK-0000io-00; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:46:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:46:08 +0100 To: John Carr Cc: Sven Luther , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) Message-ID: <20040322064608.GA2717@lambda> References: <20040319151233.GA26339@lambda> <200403212111.i2LLBNTS003306@psi-phi.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403212111.i2LLBNTS003306@psi-phi.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Sven Luther X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 2004:99 bug:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 consortium:01 consortium:01 unix:02 obligation:97 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 297 On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:11:23PM -0500, John Carr wrote: > > > So, how is that different participating in the Ocaml Consortium, and > > thus making sure someone is paid to do the things you need ? Or is payng > > for one thing ok, but not for the other ? > > I read the OCaml Consortium contract and it is not a support > contract as far as I can tell. Does Inria have an obligation > to fix bugs reported by members? I believe the ocaml team will fix bug all the same, even if they have no contract with you. That is the difference between a serious developer team, and folk only there to milk money from you, like microsoft. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners