From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA09721; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:39:15 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA09614 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:39:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from pop19.ucdavis.edu (pop19.ucdavis.edu [169.237.105.29]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JCdCHd030124 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:39:13 +0100 Received: from mallorn (mallorn.ucdavis.edu [128.120.141.141]) by pop19.ucdavis.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/it-std-5.2.0) with SMTP id i2JCdALd006215; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mallorn (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:44:57 -0800 From: "Issac Trotts" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:44:57 -0800 To: Alex Baretta Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) Message-ID: <20040319124457.GC21075@mallorn> Mail-Followup-To: ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu, Alex Baretta , caml-list@inria.fr References: <20040318184118.GC702@first.in-berlin.de> <200403182010.i2IKAK1a008157@nerd-xing.mit.edu> <20040318232039.GA1912@redhat.com> <20040319103054F.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20040319085819.GB9616@redhat.com> <20040319091334.GB20532@lambda> <405AC57A.1090300@baretta.com> <20040319101741.GA21455@lambda> <405AE4F6.6010801@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405AE4F6.6010801@baretta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; issac:01 trotts:01 ijtrotts:01 ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 gerd's:01 gerd:01 impossibile:99 compiles:01 issac:01 trotts:01 ijtrotts:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 228 > This thread seems to indicate that the only viable proposal for creating > a community project around Ocaml is Gerd's GODI. I'm glad that Xavier > gave Gerd some informal backing. However, managing GODI is going to be > troublesome (not impossibile, just troublesome) until the licensing will > allow GODI to incorporate in its codebase any patches which the GODI > maintainer/team will consider appropriate. GODI packages can be made that include both the source and the patches, and the patches can be automatically applied by GODI just before it compiles OCaml. What would be wrong with doing it this way? -- Issac Trotts http://mallorn.ucdavis.edu/~ijtrotts (w) 530-757-8789 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners