From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA22659; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:54:37 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA21715 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:54:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0601.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2J8t4KW007624 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:55:04 +0100 Received: from lambda (AStrasbourg-206-1-23-200.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.251.200]) by mwinf0601.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B198734001C1; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:54:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by lambda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4FmG-0005FZ-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:54:52 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:54:52 +0100 To: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons Cc: Nicolas Cannasse , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) Message-ID: <20040319085452.GD14831@lambda> References: <00cd01c40cdb$71c34410$4500a8c0@warp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Sven Luther X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 2004:99 pons:01 librairies:01 facto:01 extlib:01 extlib:01 baire:01 fernandez:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 199 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:55:43PM +0100, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons wrote: > Bonjour, > > > - try to build librairies with the hope that they'll one time become > > standard (de facto, or integrated into official release) : that's > > what we're doing with ExtLib (http://ocaml-lib.sf.net) > > Autant je suis tout a fait favorable aux initiatives qui comme ExtLib > (les deux versions), Baire, MLlib ou OCamlGraph (pour ne citer que MLlib qui n'est pas libre cependant, et lorsque j'ai voulu en faire un package debian, tout allait bien jusqu'au moment ou j'ai demande si une modification de la licence etait possible, depuis, aucun de mes mails n'a eu de reponse. Amicalement, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners