From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA17935; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:04:41 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA19653 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:04:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (cantina.students.cs.unibo.it [130.136.3.110]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29I4wKW028080 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:04:58 +0100 Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (cantina.students.cs.unibo.it [130.136.3.110]) by cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6E5C094 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:04:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id 33EF3274229; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:04:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:04:39 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library Message-ID: <20040309180439.GA12481@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20040309173009.27908.qmail@web41215.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040309173009.27908.qmail@web41215.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; bononia:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 2004:99 otherlibs:01 mli:01 posix:01 api:01 mli:01 bononia:01 unix:02 unix:02 bologna:03 wrote:03 zacchiroli:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 95 On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:30:09AM -0800, Vasili Galchin wrote: > I have yet to finish reading through otherlibs/unix/unix.mli. I kind > of consider this POSIX API support. In any case, is there is a > consensus that what is in unix.mli is complete? Or does new > functionality have to be added? If so, what? Yet another example: process group handling system calls are completely missing. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners