From: "Eric C. Cooper" <ecc@cmu.edu>
To: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] structural comparison of records
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:46:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040306214619.GA17735@localhost> (raw)
Is it safe to depend on the fact that structural comparison of records
proceeds in the order of the record fields? The implementation does
this, but it seems to be left unspecified in the manual.
For example, will
type version = { major: int; minor: int }
always be ordered as expected? Or should I define my own comparison
function to be safe?
--
Eric C. Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
reply other threads:[~2004-03-06 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040306214619.GA17735@localhost \
--to=ecc@cmu.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox