From: "Ingo Bormuth" <Bormuth@web.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] database cache as tree of weak pointers
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:37:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402290137.i1T1bcQ13979@mailgate5.cinetic.de> (raw)
I need to implement a cache for a tree like database (directory service).
So I thought about using objects linked together by weak pointers.
module Str_Map = Map.Make (String);;
class node (parent: node option) = object (self)
val mutable node_map = Str_Map.empty
method add (name: string) (other: node) =
let weak_ptr = Weak.create 1 in
Weak.set weak_ptr 0 (Some other);
node_map <- Str_Map.add name weak_ptr node_map;
end;;
let a = ref (new node None) ;;
let b = ref (new node (Some !a)) ;;
let c = ref (new node (Some !a)) ;;
!a#add "B_IN_A" !b ;;
!a#add "C_IN_A" !c ;;
Every node has a reference to its parent node which ensures that
its parent node will not be taken away by the GC. So every node
stayes as long in memory until all its child nodes have been
taken away.
node_map maps the names of child nodes to their weak pointer.
So I can access every node simply by following its path in the tree.
I know every name is mapped to an array holding just oneweak pointer.
That doesn't look very nice but I don't see an alternative.
Is it possible to define the module Str_Map inside the node class ?
Is this way really going to work propperly ?
Is there a more elegant solution ?
Is parent really a reference ?
I really don't want to steal you time. I'm comming from C++ being
relatively new to oCaml. It took me a long time to think of that
little code snippet and I feel I need some feedback on wheather the
way of thinking if the one intended by the language design.
Thank you in advance - Ingo Bormuth
______________________________________________________________________________
Extra-Konto: 2,50 %* Zinsen p. a. ab dem ersten Euro! Nur hier mit 25
Euro-Tankgutschein & ExtraPramie! https://extrakonto.web.de/?mc=021110
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-29 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-29 1:37 Ingo Bormuth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-29 1:29 Ingo Bormuth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402290137.i1T1bcQ13979@mailgate5.cinetic.de \
--to=bormuth@web.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox