From: Alexander Epifanov <epifanov@komset.ru>
To: Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Epifanov <epifanov@komset.ru>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:36:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040129063633.GA4337@inv_machine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200401282326.i0SNQntl004612@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com>
On 18:26 Wed 28 Jan , Chet Murthy wrote:
I agree with you on all items.
I've written a lot of java applications. "Java - slow sux" - it's right.
I don't think the JVM is a good solution. I told about scala, which used JVM,
but I don't want to tell "We need to use JVM".
The basic problem in projects in which I took part, was that I could not use
ocaml _only_ to make project complete. I wrote a lot of C/C++ functions to use
ocaml with CORBA or SNMP for example.
>
> Alexander,
>
> I don't know what to say, except that clearly, you should spend some
> time in the trenches, working with the COBOL of the 21st Century --
> Java.
>
> That's what I do for a living. I've written extremely complex Java
> systems. I've debugged more Java code than anybody else at my current
> employer, and I'm not kidding.
>
> And, y'know what?
>
> Java/the JVM still sux.
>
> I left CAML in 1994, when it still didn't have a native-code
> compiler. I started hacking on Java in the spring of 1996. I've got
> code in (probably) every JVM. I've debugged dozens of very large, and
> hundreds of only somewhat large Java deployments, some of them in
> situations involving large amounts of business at risk.
>
> And y'know what?
>
> Java/the JVM still sux.
>
> "concurrency"! You ever tried to use Java threads to do anything
> meaningful? Check out the J2EE spec. It basically is BUILT around
> NOT sharing anything between threads.
>
> Oh, and y'know, we have a joke: "every Java bug is a connection-pool
> (or resource-pool) bug".
>
> Here's another: "When you arrive onsite, grep for synchronized, and
> if you see it, put your laptop back in your bag, tell 'em you're going
> to get coffee, and don't come back".
>
> Java/the JVM is not a systems-programming language. Period. Oh, and
> I'll defend that against all comers. Difference is, though, if you
> wanna attack, I'll expect real examples, not the academic crap that
> most programming language theorists throw around.
>
> --chet--
>
> P.S. I came back to CAML for personal programming in 1999, and after
> that four-year hiatus, during which I became a commercial JVM
> internals guy, as well as a commercial transaction-processing
> firefighter (think "Mr. Wolf" from _Pulp Fiction_). So I think I have
> the experience to compare, and the verdict seems manifestly
> incontrovertible: Java/the JVM sux.
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
--
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-29 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-27 6:32 Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 8:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-27 9:43 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 18:32 ` Shawn Wagner
2004-01-28 4:38 ` skaller
2004-01-28 5:30 ` james woodyatt
[not found] ` <40168498.6070708@tfb.com>
2004-01-27 19:10 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-28 13:29 ` David Fox
2004-01-28 15:12 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-27 9:41 ` Alexander Danilov
2004-01-27 9:57 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 16:43 ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-27 18:19 ` David Fox
2004-01-27 18:47 ` Richard Jones
2004-01-27 19:29 ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-28 13:30 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-28 23:26 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-28 23:47 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 0:00 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:04 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:11 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 0:34 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:47 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer' Matt Gushee
2004-01-29 8:52 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 16:20 ` fancy types (was Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer) William Lovas
2004-01-29 17:13 ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:26 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2004-01-29 17:17 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 17:41 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 19:18 ` William Lovas
2004-01-30 10:36 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-31 3:39 ` William Lovas
2004-02-01 2:11 ` Vasile Rotaru
2004-02-02 11:08 ` Florian Hars
2004-01-29 18:33 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 17:53 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer skaller
2004-01-29 5:20 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-29 6:36 ` Alexander Epifanov [this message]
2004-01-29 8:53 ` [Caml-list] ocaml and concurrency james woodyatt
2004-01-29 9:46 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 10:37 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 11:51 ` Michael Hicks
2004-01-29 12:20 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 12:43 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 15:42 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 16:11 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 16:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 17:19 ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:43 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 17:54 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 18:08 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30 0:19 ` Lauri Alanko
2004-01-29 19:37 ` skaller
2004-01-30 0:05 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30 6:52 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30 8:53 ` Issac Trotts
2004-01-30 20:45 ` skaller
2004-01-31 6:29 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30 20:12 ` skaller
2004-01-29 18:35 ` skaller
2004-01-29 9:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 18:26 ` skaller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-23 10:19 [Caml-list] ocaml killer Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 8:28 ` Richard Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040129063633.GA4337@inv_machine \
--to=epifanov@komset.ru \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=chet@watson.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox