From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA01823; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:41:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA12231 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:41:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos.bsdclusters.com [69.55.225.36]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0DJfU511120 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:41:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos [69.55.225.36]) by demos.bsdclusters.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DJfQUc069451; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:41:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmacy@fsmware.com) Received: from localhost (kmacy@localhost) by demos.bsdclusters.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i0DJfQ3N069448; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:41:26 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: demos.bsdclusters.com: kmacy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:41:26 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy X-X-Sender: kmacy@demos.bsdclusters.com To: Richard Jones cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] GC and C In-Reply-To: <20040113183448.GA29515@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040113113141.H94909@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <20040113175600.79608.qmail@web21403.mail.yahoo.com> <20040113183448.GA29515@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; kip:99 caml-list:01 gdb:01 gdb:01 binaries:01 volunteering:01 ocamlopt:01 ocaml:01 dump:01 native:02 stack:02 output:05 core:06 i'm:07 memory:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > If you've corrupted the memory, one of them will fail, and the stack > trace is often very informative in these cases. -- Hopefully you'll be > able to get a core dump and use gdb on it. Speaking of GDB, just as a quick poll, are there many people who strongly feel that they would like to have ocaml support in GDB for native binaries? Or am I unique? I'm not volunteering right now, but I've done a bit of work in GDB for work in the past. Of course ocamlopt would have generate stabs or dwarf output, which would be contingent on the willingness of Xavier et al. to commit it. Thanks. -Kip ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners