From: Michal Moskal <malekith@pld-linux.org>
To: Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
Cc: ramb@sonic.net, caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] what is the functional way to solve this problem?
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:09:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031008160915.GA4730@roke.freak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310081448.QAA14841@pauillac.inria.fr>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:48:09PM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> [...]
> > Key points of my implementation:
> [...]
> > 3. It doesn't use Scanf. For such linear task as this Scanf takes 10 or
> > more times to parse input then actual computations.
> [...]
> > --
> > : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
> > : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h
>
> I'm sorry to report that I was so puzzled by your number 3) key point,
> that I tested your code and a ``purely scanf'' version to see this
> ``10 or more times to parse'' behaviour; I didn't notice any runtime
> difference between the two (native code compiled) versions. Am I
> missing something ?
Hm, with your version it's only 3 times slower:
-rw-r--r-- 1 malekith users 1909887 Oct 8 18:02 /shm/d2
./statsf < /shm/d2 > /dev/null 0.31s user 0.01s system 103% cpu 0.308
total
./stats < /shm/d2 > /dev/null 0.10s user 0.00s system 155% cpu 0.064
total
However, your code is not correct:
> Could you please try to use the following version of your read
> function, and report the runtime difference between your hand written
> code ?
>
> (BTW, I compiled the 2 programs using ocamlopt -unsafe -inline 9)
>
> let read () =
> try
> Scanf.bscanf Scanf.Scanning.stdib " %c" (function
> | 'D' ->
> Scanf.bscanf Scanf.Scanning.stdib " %d %d %s"
----------------------------------------------------^^
It should be [^\n], as filenames can contain spaces. In this case:
./statsf < /shm/d2 > /dev/null 1.56s user 0.04s system 96% cpu 1.654
total
Well, it's 15 times slower.
All tests were run on athlon 1.56GHz, under pld-linux, ocaml 3.07,
ocamlopt -unsafe -inline 9.
--
: Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-08 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-02 12:31 Ram Bhamidipaty
2003-10-02 14:53 ` Michal Moskal
2003-10-08 14:48 ` Pierre Weis
2003-10-08 16:09 ` Michal Moskal [this message]
2003-10-08 20:34 ` Pierre Weis
2003-10-08 21:22 ` scanf (Re: [Caml-list] what is the functional way to solve this problem?) Michal Moskal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031008160915.GA4730@roke.freak \
--to=malekith@pld-linux.org \
--cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
--cc=pierre.weis@inria.fr \
--cc=ramb@sonic.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox