From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA30693; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:38:08 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA24578 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:38:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h8L9c6H26152 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:38:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA03498 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:38:06 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:38:06 +0200 From: Xavier Leroy To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Commercial application written in O'Caml: ExcelEverywhere Message-ID: <20030921113806.A19037@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <3F6AB7CB.6020505@abc.se> <1063969848.27470.42.camel@pelican> <200309191829.04642.oleg_trott@columbia.edu> <3F6C1966.3000706@abc.se> <001601c37f59$209af930$0601a8c0@hotteling> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <001601c37f59$209af930$0601a8c0@hotteling>; from jeanmarc.eber@lexifi.com on Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:25:26AM +0200 X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 peanuts:01 damien:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 caml:01 off-topic:01 consortium:01 consortium:01 o'caml:02 licence:03 jean-marc:03 scheme:03 inria's:05 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > Commercial developers using Ocaml should also, I think, consider seriously > (becoming member of) the Caml Consortium. Thanks Jean-Marc for the plug. Indeed, OCaml has a dual-licensing scheme: members of the Caml consortium automatically benefit from very liberal licensing conditions, roughly comparable to a BSD license. This comes in exchange for a 1000 Eur/year membership fee. This fee is a real bargain given the number of man.years that were invested in the development of OCaml, and is peanuts for even the smallest company. This said, I agree with Damien that this discussion is getting off-topic for this mailing list. If you wish to discuss htmlc's licence, John Max Skaller's views on software, or INRIA's position on OSI licenses this week, please do that ELSEWHERE. Thank you. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners