From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA18353; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:39:42 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA12711 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:39:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ep09.kernel.pl (ep09.kernel.pl [212.87.11.162]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h7FDddf29995 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:39:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 14543 invoked by uid 566); 15 Aug 2003 13:39:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:36:24 +0200 From: Michal Moskal To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Print dependencies of a module, and other useful functions Message-ID: <20030815133624.GA19377@roke.freak> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20030807130419.GA5044@redhat.com> <20030807132314.GA32161@roke.freak> <20030815132159.GA3774@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030815132159.GA3774@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: CF89 1B14 11BE 1CC9 2CA3 7497 5E32 69B4 BC71 B4C2 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; michal:01 moskal:01 malekith:01 pld-linux:01 caml-list:01 dependencies:01 cmx:01 compiler:01 kernel:01 ocaml:01 0200,:01 patch:02 native:02 objects:02 module:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:21:59PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:23:14PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > > Try looking at tools/objinfo.ml. I have a patch for it to support also > > *.cmx* files. You'll find it attached. > > Have you proposed this patch upstream? > > I'm using objinfo to check for consistencies over a set of ocaml > "objects" and I find really tedious the lack of *.cmx* support ... I'm not sure about architectures that lack native compiler (I don't have access for any for that matter). That's why I didn't propse it. -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners