From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: brogoff@speakeasy.net
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] static class member....
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:12:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030807091253T.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308060901130.15452-100000@grace.speakeasy.net>
From: brogoff@speakeasy.net
> A non-orthogonality of the let within a class is that let module isn't
> permitted. Is there any reason it isn't?
This is indeed unfortunate, and I've wished for its presence several
times.
I don't think there is a theoretical reason.
However the typing of classes being done in several passes, this would
be much more difficult to implement correctly than the let module
inside usual expressions.
Jacques Garrigue
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-07 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-06 12:35 [Caml-list] Unix.kill on Win32 James Scott
2003-08-06 12:57 ` [Caml-list] static class member Vovka
2003-08-06 14:45 ` Richard Jones
2003-08-06 14:51 ` David Brown
2003-08-06 15:10 ` Richard Jones
2003-08-06 16:12 ` brogoff
2003-08-06 17:43 ` Richard Jones
2003-08-06 18:11 ` David Brown
2003-08-06 18:30 ` William Lovas
2003-08-06 18:14 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-08-07 0:12 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2003-08-07 5:20 ` james woodyatt
2003-08-07 17:02 ` brogoff
2003-08-07 21:53 ` John Max Skaller
2003-08-06 16:24 ` David Brown
2003-08-07 0:21 ` [Caml-list] Unix.kill on Win32 Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-07 0:41 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-08 14:38 [Caml-list] static class member Arturo Borquez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030807091253T.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--cc=brogoff@speakeasy.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox