From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA23848; Tue, 27 May 2003 23:11:03 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA23818 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 23:11:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from opus.davidb.org (66-75-152-1.san.rr.com [66.75.152.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h4RLB0T07060 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 23:11:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from davidb by opus.davidb.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 19Klij-0002p4-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 14:10:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 14:10:57 -0700 From: David Brown To: Stephen Tse Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] higher-order and format Message-ID: <20030527211057.GA10818@opus.davidb.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 higher-order:01 0400,:01 bug:01 sprintf:01 printf:01 partially:02 dave:03 wrote:03 behavior:03 documented:07 examples:07 davidb:08 function:09 david:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:52:47PM -0400, Stephen Tse wrote: > is this a bug? > > ...examples of sprintf partially applied... It is documented for printf, but the behavior is not documented for sprintf. Although, it does do what I would expect :-) None of the format function really do the "right" thing when they are partiall applied. Dave Brown ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners