From: Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
To: lists@stefanheimann.net (Stefan Heimann)
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamllex, regular expression syntax
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 08:31:39 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305230631.IAA31844@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030522205632.GA2130@kunz.ratzer> from Stefan Heimann at "May 22, 103 10:56:33 pm"
Hi,
[...]
> But the regular expression syntax in the Str module looks "normal" to
> me.
>
> Regular expressions like this
>
> "[^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*"
>
> are not easy to read,
I suppose you did not try this, since it is not a legal regular
expression. I guess you mean
"[^\\"\\]*(\\.[^\\"\\]*)*"
(Hence, the ``normal looking'' of those reg-exps does not imply simple,
clear, and natural syntax !)
> but with the ocamllex syntax it is even more
> difficult:
>
> '"'[^'"''\\']*('\\'_[^'"''\\']*)*'"'
>
> (and harder to write).
It is not so clear to me: the ' conventions are exactly those of the
language (hence there is no need to \\ the " symbols), the _ gets its
"normal" meaning of ``whatever'' or ``catch all case'' pattern...
> Is this just for historical reason or is there a practical reason for
> this syntax? I'm just curious...
It's just natural: you would start by giving syntax to match chars,
hence you ``naturally'' write them inside quotes following the Caml
convention. The rest of the regular expressions constructs,
succession, alternative, repetitition, range and catch-all just follow
almost automatically.
Regards,
Pierre Weis
INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-23 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-22 20:56 Stefan Heimann
2003-05-22 23:04 ` David Brown
2003-05-23 8:36 ` Stefan Heimann
2003-05-23 6:31 ` Pierre Weis [this message]
2003-05-23 8:27 ` Stefan Heimann
2003-05-23 8:53 ` Luc Maranget
2003-06-02 23:42 ` John Max Skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305230631.IAA31844@pauillac.inria.fr \
--to=pierre.weis@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=lists@stefanheimann.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox