From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA02642; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:20 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA02633 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:18 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from smtp4.cp.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h36CPH924035 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dalamar.takhisis.org (80.117.62.147) by smtp4.cp.tin.it (6.7.016) id 3E8D751D0009FC76 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:16 +0200 Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org (lordsoth.takhisis.org [192.168.1.119]) by dalamar.takhisis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07BBBEF1 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lordsoth.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id AF2F67070; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:25:14 +0200 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Our shrinking Humps Message-ID: <20030406122514.GA1589@lordsoth.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20030405060347.GA2823@iliana> <200304052106.XAA05780@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304052106.XAA05780@pauillac.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-Spam: no; 0.00; bononia:01 caml-list:01 shrinking:01 pierre:01 weis:01 ocaml:01 05,:01 0200,:01 subscribe:97 bologna:03 wrote:03 zacchiroli:03 romney:03 unibo:03 account:96 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:06:28PM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote: > 50 cm away from the machine you are logged in!)). By the way, there is > no ``Joe Random Ocaml Developer'' here: we will give accounts to > selected people only (trusted people I would say). Thanks for the clear explanation. The remaining quid is to better define the concept of "trusted people" :) Here at university of Bologna we are used to give "guest" accounts to people that accept to subscribe an "assumption of responsibilities" (I hope this is a correct english translation) for action performed with their guest account. Do you use a similar approach at INRIA? > Do you think this would be a reasonable solution ? Are there problems > I do not imagine ? No, it seems a reasonable given that "trusted people" are enough to maintain the project. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners