From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA05624; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:06:46 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA05665 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:06:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h35L6T505357; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:06:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA05780; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:06:28 +0200 (MET DST) From: Pierre Weis Message-Id: <200304052106.XAA05780@pauillac.inria.fr> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Our shrinking Humps In-Reply-To: <20030405060347.GA2823@iliana> from Sven Luther at "Apr 5, 103 08:03:47 am" To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (Sven Luther) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:06:28 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru, zack@bononia.it, caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; pierre:01 weis:01 caml-list:01 shrinking:01 sven:01 luther:01 connectivity:99 cristal:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 complex:03 account:96 standalone:05 accounts:92 i'm:07 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi All, Thank you everybody for being interested at maintaining a standalone set of Caml software for the communauty. I'm afraid I will not be able to set up the thing and answer to everybody before the end of my vacations (during the full next week). I will tell you more the week after! > Err, i think the issue is more about if INRIA trust you to have an > account inside their firewall or not. A security issue about trusting > Joe Random Ocaml Developer. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther INRIA is a strange and complex house: we may have a machine inside INRIA with all the corresponding facilities (no power failures, good connectivity, full automatic backup), while maintaining this machine outside the INRIA firewall (so, there is no way for you to connect from this machine to a machine inside the INRIA network (even if it is 50 cm away from the machine you are logged in!)). By the way, there is no ``Joe Random Ocaml Developer'' here: we will give accounts to selected people only (trusted people I would say). I was thinking of something like that, experimenting with a machine outside our firewall and running a strong and secure OS (FreeBSD ?) to have a very low maintenance cost. Do you think this would be a reasonable solution ? Are there problems I do not imagine ? All the best, Pierre Weis INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners