From: Markus Mottl <markus@oefai.at>
To: Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] DFT in OCaml vs. C
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:21:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030327142101.GB1931@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E82A960.2070707@ucdavis.edu>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Issac Trotts wrote:
> The results on my 1 GHZ Pentium III Linux box:
>
> C:
> real 0m21.273s
> user 0m21.200s
> sys 0m0.040s
>
> OCaml:
> real 1m51.602s
> user 1m47.020s
> sys 0m0.260s
Well, another insignificant benchmark... ;-)
My timings on a 2.4 GHZ Pentium IV using GCC 2.95.4 and the latest
CVS-checkout of OCaml:
C:
real 0m24.920s
user 0m24.900s
sys 0m0.020s
OCaml:
real 0m30.397s
user 0m30.390s
sys 0m0.000s
The difference you have observed on your machine is most likely due to
cache effects and possibly also due to compiler differences (GCC version).
Regards,
Markus Mottl
--
Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-27 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-27 7:33 Issac Trotts
2003-03-27 10:58 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2003-03-27 19:40 ` Issac Trotts
2003-03-27 14:21 ` Markus Mottl [this message]
2003-03-27 20:47 ` Issac Trotts
2003-03-27 14:32 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-03-27 14:55 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-03-27 16:06 ` OCaml performance (was: Re: [Caml-list] DFT in OCaml vs. C) David Monniaux
2003-03-27 21:27 ` Issac Trotts
2003-03-27 20:54 ` [Caml-list] DFT in OCaml vs. C Issac Trotts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030327142101.GB1931@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at \
--to=markus@oefai.at \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox