From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA06272; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:55:30 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA05806 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:55:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2QAtTX09171 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:55:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from iliana (AStrasbourg-206-1-20-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.169.128]) by mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CF3C0001BB for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:55:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by iliana with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18y8Z5-00013y-00 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:55:27 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:55:27 +0100 To: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Message-ID: <20030326105527.GA4082@iliana> References: <3E81640C.40009@baretta.com> <20030326104841.GA8502@lordsoth.takhisis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030326104841.GA8502@lordsoth.takhisis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Sven Luther X-Spam: no; 0.00; sven:01 luther:01 dpt-info:01 u-strasbg:01 caml-list:01 camlimages:01 labltk:01 alessandro:01 baretta:01 co-exist:01 cluttering:01 coexist:01 lablgtk:01 module:03 wrote:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:48:41AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 09:25:48AM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > > > I observed that both camlimages and labltk have a module > > > Any idea how I can get both to co-exist? Thanks. > > This is a problem that comes up every so often: module > > namespace cluttering. Some time ago I had pointed a name > > Yes, but the question was more specific: how can I have _camlimages_ and > _labltk_ coexist? IMO, it had nothing to do with a general namespace > cluttering problem. > > So probably we need an answer from lablgtk and camlimages authors here. > > Is it possible to change one (or both) of the modules' names? I don't understand what would be wrong with a Labltk.Image and a Camlimage.Image ? Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners