From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA05648; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:22:40 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA05307 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:22:38 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from web10306.mail.yahoo.com (web10306.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.84]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id h2J0MbX03251 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:22:38 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <20030319002237.37761.qmail@web10306.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.230.238.2] by web10306.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:22:37 NZST Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:22:37 +1200 (NZST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Graham=20Guttocks?= Subject: Re: [Caml-list] toplevel command history/editing? To: SooHyoung Oh Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <002a01c2edac$d487e9b0$fe00a8c0@hama> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ledit:01 ocaml':01 sms:99 telstra:99 ocaml:01 caml:01 command:98 toplevel:01 shoh:03 wrote:03 soohyoung:03 duonix:05 email:92 humps:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk SooHyoung Oh wrote: > > Please check "ledit" and "ocaml2" in Caml humps pages. That's nice, but why isn't this ability built into `ocaml'? I can't think of a reason why any user would not want this. ===== Regards, Graham http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile - Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners