From: Jeffrey Palmer <jeffrey.palmer@acm.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] The Use of C--?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:02:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212171202.07149.jeffrey.palmer@acm.org> (raw)
Has been any discussion on the possibility of using C-- (www.cminusminus.org)
as a compiler back-end for O'Caml? (I took a look through the archives, but
didn't see anything relevant.) I'm not suggesting that things would be better
or worse than they are now, I'm just interested in the thoughts of the O'Caml
team.
Since there's already a back-end that generates very efficient native code, is
there any benefit to moving to this type of model? Are there specific issues
that have been addressed in the existing native code generator that preclude
the use of C--?
Thanks,
- j
--
The river is moving.
The blackbird must be flying.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-17 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-17 18:02 Jeffrey Palmer [this message]
2002-12-17 18:41 ` Norman Ramsey
2002-12-17 18:52 ` Michal Moskal
2002-12-17 18:59 ` Dmitry Bely
2002-12-17 19:00 ` Fermin Reig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212171202.07149.jeffrey.palmer@acm.org \
--to=jeffrey.palmer@acm.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox