From: Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu>
To: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] function
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:31:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021206213120.GC696@boson.ucdavis.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212051800.55361.oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>
Oleg wrote:
> On Thursday 05 December 2002 03:24 pm, Issac Trotts wrote:
> > List.concat (List.map to_list2 strs);;
>
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> > > 2) What is the complexity of your function f ?
> >
> > The new ones have linear time complexity w.r.t. the number of
> > characters. The old one has quadratic time complexity.
>
> Issac
>
> I haven't analyzed your whole functions, but List.flatten'ing alone is
> O(S*L^2), so while it may be linear WRT the number of characters in one
> string, it's not necessarily linear WRT the total number of characters. See
> my version of f for O(L*S) time.
>
> Cheers
> Oleg
Thanks for pointing this out.
Here's flatten, from list.ml:
let rec flatten = function
[] -> []
| l::r -> l @ flatten r
let concat = flatten
Here's (@), from pervasives.ml :
let rec (@) l1 l2 =
match l1 with
[] -> l2
| hd :: tl -> hd :: (tl @ l2)
If the given list has L elements, each with S items, then flatten should
O((L*S)*L) = O(S*L^2) time, since you have to keep on churning through
every single element in the ever-expanding l at every recursive flatten
call. That's too bad.
Here's an experiment I tried:
$ cat ftime.ml
let rec make_list_of_lists = function
| 0 -> []
| n -> [1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8] :: make_list_of_lists(n-1)
let _ =
let n = int_of_string(Sys.argv.(1)) in
let lol = make_list_of_lists n in
ignore(List.flatten(lol))
;;
$ ocamlopt -o ftime ftime.ml
$ for (( i=0; $i<100; i++ ))
do
/usr/bin/time -o data -a -f "%U" ./ftime "$i"000
done
$ gnuplot
> plot 'data'
I guess it looks linear because of the small input size.
This gives me the impression that List.flatten is practical,
at least for small data sets.
Issac
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-06 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-02 15:55 altavillasalvatore
2002-12-02 16:29 ` sebastien FURIC
2002-12-02 17:35 ` Oleg
2002-12-03 23:22 ` Issac Trotts
2002-12-05 10:00 ` Pierre Weis
2002-12-05 20:24 ` Issac Trotts
2002-12-05 23:00 ` Oleg
2002-12-06 21:31 ` Issac Trotts [this message]
2002-12-07 10:28 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-12-07 17:31 ` Oleg
2002-12-05 20:46 ` Oleg
2002-12-05 21:06 ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2002-12-06 7:38 Jeremy Fincher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021206213120.GC696@boson.ucdavis.edu \
--to=ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox